can you convert a civil 3d drawing to microstation 3d
Request for someone..are there any issues converting from Civil 3D to Microstation?
Topic starter Posted : August 11, 2022 v:28 am
Are you asking about the conversion of files betwixt the two? Or are you request about a user frustration level?
After using both for years I derived Paden'due south second dominion of the universe: Those that use both are proficient with neither. 😉
Posted : August 11, 2022 6:34 am
Your questions are limited. Microstation is the CAD platform equally is AutoCAD. CAD is the media upon which we draft upon, such as paper, vellum or mylar. Civil apps increase the drafting production and perform analysis.
AutoDesk has a Civil3d that runs on meridian of the AutoCAD engine. Bentley has several Civil Applications that run on summit of Microstation including InRoads/OpenRoads, MxRoads and GEOPak.
The CAD elements can be converted to Microstation volition petty try.
The enhanced civil applications are propeitory to each vendor. The latest versions of of CAD software take embbed civil applications that do not transfer well. Information technology depends which version.
It tin be done.
Posted : August xi, 2022 vii:03 am
There are bug! Different beasts!
A unproblematic salvage equally dgn won't give you the usual microstation objects every user is and then fond of.
I think the best way may be by converting your data to landxml to exchange in both directions.
Posted : August 11, 2022 7:04 am
I started with AutoCad two.something and after a few years used Microstation four. I've used both over the years. It has e'er seemed that both companies revel in making sure there is always some level of incompatibility.
Christ is spot on... "Dissimilar beasts".
Posted : Baronial 11, 2022 7:26 am
Non without many headaches. The only thing we convert between the 2 is surfaces and this is only because of most insane surface editing/processing cluster f of a programme MS is.
We ran into also many problems trying to convert other components as they never come across in a functional manner.
Posted : August eleven, 2022 7:29 am
@leegreen CAD is non a media, it is Computer Aided Design.
Posted : August eleven, 2022 7:48 am
Civil 3d has a role within information technology to "Export to AutoCAD". Which highlights that there are a lot of elements within a C3d drawing that even AutoCAD won't play with. Within the same area there is likewise export to various editions of Microstation. I have no idea how well that works.
Microstation will open .dwg files and relieve to that format likewise. Just how well the diverse C3d objects get interpreted is unknown to me. If you are dealing with only vanilla AutoCAD elements I'd bet that information technology does very well.
Posted : August 11, 2022 8:01 am
If yous reference a civil3d dwg into microstation y'all will encounter a whole bunch of squares around civil 3d features that microstation doesn't jive with (survey points, symbol blocks, survey figures, etc.). To resolve: in c3d consign> as acad dwg (this dumbs down all the civil3d features to more basic simple entities that tin be seen in microstation). Once y'all have the "saved back" acad dwg version, it should reference into microstation cleanly.
I typically then start a new microstation dgn (prepare to correct units and coord.sys., that also uses the microstation seed file that I need, typically a DOT seed file which sets me up with there levels(microstation lingo for layers), then reference in the acad dwg and copy from the reference into the dgn layer by layer, assigning to the appropriate DOT level. Toggling on and off the reference during allows me to continue rails of what I've got left to copy. If you do this a lot it can be automatic with a conversion template, but I haven't yet found the demand. Too the whole procedure I draw in this paragraph is really simply for the more annoying conversion of getting a c3d dwg that is non-DOT standards into a microstation dgn matching DOT standards.
If I don't have the need to alter the layering/appearance of the source c3d dwg- I just export information technology dorsum to acad and and so reference it into a new microstation dgn and bind/copy everything into the dgn.
I don't typically export a dgn from inside autocad. For me, being able to control the units/coordinate organization of the destination dgn from inside microstation is more experience proficient. If you don't accept microstation and a client is simply asking for an dgn version of a dwg, I would recommend just saving back to acad and providing that. Though theres as well the challenge of ensuring the coordinates aren't shifted in the conversion, 1 of my biggest worries and items I experience I am constantly policing. If you don't have microstation and must consign a dgn from c3d I actually don't remember if you tin can do information technology with a c3d drawing that has civil3d features. My approach to be rubber would be to consign to acad (not-c3d dwg), and so go in there and consign that to dgn. I would also leave big text straight in my modelspace of what the coordinate system/datum is, and likewise label at least two coordinates in the drawing, so if someone else is opening information technology in microstation they can check to make sure they didn't mess up the microstation units/organization.
No matter what, when converting between c3d and microstation, I always check the coordinate of a couple vertices in the original and converted drawings at the finish. No ane wants a survey foot/international human foot consequence to bite them later.
Another side annotation: When going the other direction- exporting a dwg from within microstation, it works well and is easy to practice (no saving dorsum the microstation dgn or annihilation). All the same, While microstation is able to consign a dwg format, information technology is not able to properly assign the coordinate system. And so if yous have a microstation dgn fix to NY east 83 zone (u.south. due south.ft) and you export a dwg, when yous then open the dwg in c3d it will be set to no coord.arrangement - international ft. The values of everything are correct, you just need to assign the coordinate system and relieve. This is just relabeling the xy axis in c3d, information technology's non reprojecting anything. Once more, final check, always compare sample vertices in original and destination drawings.
For converting surfaces from c3d to microstation I e'er directly apply all the tin triangles, not xml. I have found this to be safer, as exporting an xml surface from c3d is exporting the breaklines, points, boundary, but non the verbal triangulation. When I import the xml into Inroads in microstation to rebuild, Inroads may rebuild the surface using the aforementioned contraints (points breaklines purlieus), simply the triangles that are open up for estimation information technology may build slightly dissimilar than c3d. I may exist wrong on this because its been awhile since I've tried doing it with xml, but way dorsum that was my understanding. My typical workflow is to ready c3d surface to tin view, and then extract objects> excerpt 3d faces/triangles, and then do the same with the surface boundary. Then I bring the drawing with 3d faces and boundary over to microstation and import all the triangles into an inroads surface as breaklines, and the boundary as a perimeter. Then let inroads rebuild it. Simply my way of doing it, just like anything I'grand sure theres many other acceptable means.
Posted : August 11, 2022 8:33 am
If you're asking about format conversions, Civil 3D has a 'export to other formats' routine where you lot can detect DNG format for export. Also, I remember that Microstation can open directly dwg files natively.
Posted : August 11, 2022 9:04 am
@chris-bouffard
Duh! it was a metaphor .......
Posted : Baronial xi, 2022 9:09 am
Going from 1 to the other is possible but if you're looking for a smooth transition between the two, you lot might exist hard pressed to find ane.
There are some "converters" out there just I haven't used them.
Too, it depends if you're wanting to take ceremonious objects to Microstation likewise. If and so, y'all would be better off converting linework, then doing an import of points then you have a .prj and the proper cells are inserted.
Proficient luck!
Posted : Baronial eleven, 2022 10:39 am
Thanks all.
Topic starter Posted : August xi, 2022 11:58 am
From feel I will tell y'all it is extremely painful to get C3D objects into MicroStation. The AutoCad objects are simple. The DTM can be exported as a LandXML file. Points and feature lines are a real pain. It is fourth dimension consuming but tin exist done though. I recently did a couple of miles of topo for ODOT.
Posted : August xiv, 2022 12:46 pm
jacksonyoulderven.blogspot.com
Source: https://surveyorconnect.com/community/software-cad-mapping/c3d-to-microstation-conversion/
0 Response to "can you convert a civil 3d drawing to microstation 3d"
Post a Comment